Monday, April 29, 2019

Cool


Encouraging news from Lawrence Solomon, executive director of Energy Probe, a Toronto-based environmental group

The greatest scientific fraud of the century will be laid bare, along with its corrupt enablers in government, academia, industry and the media

A few grafs from the article:

... No one paying attention can have any doubt that the governmental global warming enterprise has been a fraud. It’s been lies from the start, starting with the very mandate of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which astonishingly ruled out factors like the sun as being worthy of investigation ...

Likewise, a much heralded claim that 97 per cent of scientists believed the planet was overheating came from a 2008 master’s thesis by a student at the University of Illinois who obtained her results by conducting a survey of 10,257 earth scientists, then discarding the views of all but 77 of them. Of those 77 scientists, 75 thought humans contributed to climate change.  The ratio 75/77 produced the 97-per-cent figure that global warming activists then touted.

In fact, major surveys show that scientists in the tens of thousands do not believe that global warming represents a threat. With the departure of president Obama and his administration, which had blocked independent investigations from being pursued, whistleblowers in greater numbers will now dare to come forward, knowing they will no longer be silenced ...

The blizzard of lies from NOAA and other corrupted agencies will soon be outed in excruciating detail. The greatest scientific fraud of the century will thus be laid bare, along with its craven and corrupt enablers in government, academia, industry and the media.

_____

If you're on Twitter, follow Patrick Moore @EcoSenseNow.  He was a founder of Greenpeace but left when they started viewing people as enemies of the earth.  He tweeted a link to this article, which might not otherwise have come to the attention of BOTW Refugees.

Thursday, April 25, 2019


It was on fire when I found it


Byron York tweeted the following extract from "Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein Delivers Remarks at the Armenian Bar Association’s Public Servants Dinner, New York, NY ~ Thursday, April 25, 2019"

At my confirmation hearing in March 2017, a Republican Senator asked me to make a commitment. He said: “You’re going to be in charge of this [Russia] investigation. I want you to look me in the eye and tell me that you’ll do it right, that you’ll take it to its conclusion and you’ll report [your results] to the American people.”

I did pledge to do it right and take it to the appropriate conclusion. I did not promise to report all results to the public, because grand jury investigations are ex parte proceedings. It is not our job to render conclusive factual findings. We just decide whether it is appropriate to file criminal charges.

Some critical decisions about the Russia investigation were made before I got there. The previous Administration chose not to publicize the full story about Russian computer hackers and social media trolls, and how they relate to a broader strategy to undermine America. The FBI disclosed classified evidence about the investigation to ranking legislators and their staffers. Someone selectively leaked details to the news media. The FBI Director announced at a congressional hearing that there was a counterintelligence investigation that might result in criminal charges. Then the former FBI Director alleged that the President pressured him to close the investigation, and the President denied that the conversation occurred.

So that happened.


Blue cities = needles, poop and homicide victims

Henninger's column today on the Dems current "fitness for office" talking point is pure brilliance.

Money quote:

Governance matters. Success at governance—running a country, state or city—should indeed be a measure of political fitness. If so, fitness to govern looks to be in short supply in potholed New York City, homicidal Chicago, needle-park San Francisco and Baltimore, with its five police chiefs in the past five years.
All these cities, protectorates of Democratic governance, are filled with upscale progressives convinced Donald Trump is morally unfit to govern, even as they step around and over the mentally ill homeless lying abandoned on their sidewalks.

Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Hillary's emails are like the walking dead ...
She just can't get away from them.
And neither, apparently, can Obama's White House and staff.
Well, that's according to an FBI guy under oath, so ... we'll have to take that with a grain of salt, right?

Tuesday, April 23, 2019

Easter Worshippers

Posted by Jude

After the attack on Christians in Sri Lanka, Obama tweeted: “The attacks on tourists and Easter worshippers in Sri Lanka are an attack on humanity. On a day devoted to love, redemption, and renewal, we pray for the victims and stand with the people of Sri Lanka.”

Three hours later, Clinton tweeted with similar wording: “On this holy weekend for many faiths, we must stand united against hatred and violence. I’m praying for everyone affected by today’s horrific attacks on Easter worshippers and travelers in Sri Lanka.”

In the prior attack on Christians in New Zealand, Clinton tweeted: “We must continue to fight the perpetuation and normalization of Islamophobia and racism in all its forms. White supremacist terrorists must be condemned by leaders everywhere. Their murderous hatred must be stopped.”

I tried to post a comment about these three tweets at BOTW.  I was quoting the high priests of the Left verbatim.  Surely, the comment should have passed the censors.  Alas, it did not.  Perhaps it was the thrice-repeated word "Christians" that triggered the algorithm to reject the comment.

My fellow refugees, there have been no changes in comment policy at "the world's most credible newspaoer."
It was a dark and stormy night, and the moderator said ...

Posted by Jude, with hat-tip to Todd for giving me this much-needed laugh

It was a dark and stormy night ....

Your comment might be too short. Would you like to add more?

It was a dark and stormy night, and the horsemen were on the highway.

Your comment contains unacceptable weather descriptions. A moderator will review it.

It was a dark and windy night, and the horsemen were on the highway.

Horsemen makes an unsupported gender judgment. Please edit your comment.

Our bipartisan betters are botching things badly

The money quote:

The array of mistakes is bipartisan, and it has been committed collectively by journalists, bureaucrats, and public intellectuals. There is one, abiding constant: The people tasked with the day-to-day management and oversight of our government have an arrogance-to-excellence ratio that is shockingly high.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/04/mueller-report-trump-opponents-governing-class/?fbclid=IwAR2JbEBBYO5jxToquDx-ykrvQ90V2wFrLHJwURH6ufHxFevtM6AV-2-rcXI

We need a theme song ... :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFnOfpIJL0M
Yo.
I like the format. Fiona, thanks so much for all your hard work!
Let's just take baby steps at first. Leave Twitter rolling.
Because you never know.


My intent is to post articles (like the one about the demonizaton of Barr, which I also found separately) I find around the 'nets for your amusement and comment. I might even do some original stuff, but I'm eager to let this thing develop organically.

I remain stunned at the high-handed and opaque way the WSJ decide to make its drastic changes to the commenting system, and immolate the BOTW community.

Most offensive is the fact they can't just tell us what they are doing and trying to accomplish
.
Someone over there said we were being "petulant" by bailing.
I'm sorry, but when someone takes 50 percent of the value out of a product I've bought for years, "petulant" does not begin to describe my feelings.

I might buy back in to the WSJ, under my wife's name, or even my own, to snag a cheap sub.
But if they don't want me commenting, I got no problem not commenting. I didn't mind providing them with content, when they wanted my content, and yours.

PS: Not everyone uses their real name around here. Let's respect that. Because as a big brother, I know that Big Brother is always watching! :)

Sunday, April 21, 2019

Release, Redaction, Dissemination and ... Indictments?

Many of us enjoy the essays of Victor Davis Hanson.  He is clear-headed and concise.  The following are a few extracts from his recent essay in the 20 April 2019 issue of National Review,  "Why the Effort to Demonize Attorney General Barr?"

"The current progressive effort to demonize attorney general William Barr is creepy, but then again not so strange. He came into the office with singular experience and an excellent reputation from past service. As attorney general, he has followed the law to the letter in handling the release, redactions, and dissemination of the Mueller report ...

"As for the charge that Barr, a former Bush appointee, is Trump’s 'hand-picked' choice –how odd, given that all attorney generals are presidents’ hand-picked selections. How could they not be? ...

"So, more likely, the effort to delegitimize the professional Barr is the opening, preemptory salvo in the second and quite different round of investigations ...

"So the fear is not that Barr broke or will ever break the law, but rather just the opposite: He seems the sort who will follow the law wherever it leads him and without worry over the consequences — and that reality is now apparently seen by some as quite scary indeed."

Dare we hope that Barr will clean house?

Feel free to go off-topic in your comments.

Easter Sunday, 2019

Letter to BOTW Refugees

Having watched my fellow BOTW Refugees struggle in recent weeks to regroup in a new landing-spot somewhere on the interwebs, I have reached a point where I worry that we might not find consensus.  I am trying very hard not to worry, though.  I believe we can survive, though it may take time.

May I share my thoughts?  My opinion is just my opinion, nothing more.  Please read this with that in mind.  And please do comment below.  Perhaps our discussion here will help us resolve our homelessness dilemma.

I’ll start by reviewing what our alternatives are.

Fortunately, many of us have come to Twitter to keep in touch.  That’s a good start.  But outside of the Tiara’s Ark DM (group direct message) which Melly set up, Twitter is not an ideal place for posting articles to which Refugees can reply.  Twitter ain’t the WSJ.  Tweet length is an issue, but tweets can be threaded, although this creates layers and layers of replies.  My Notifications folder gets flooded with dozens upons dozens of tweets, which take a while to sift through.

I used to be on Twitter by my real name, Jude, but got kicked off the platform when I tweeted something that was politically incorrect by Twitter ‘progressive’ standards.  I came back under a pen name, Fiona Byrd, and vowed to avoid political Twitter.  I found a different Twitter, a happy Twitter, a creative Twitter.  I don’t do political Twitter under my pen name, so generally I only read what my fellow Refugees tweet, but I rarely retweet, like, or reply to political tweets.

The great thing about Tiara’s Ark DM is that what we say there stays there.  It’s private!  And there are no character limits or censors.  But the trouble is that when the group DM is filled with new mesaages, it can be hard to navigate because you can’t reply to a message immediately below the message, you have to scroll all the way down to the bottom of the thread, and mention the name of the person you’re responding to if you want to reply to something said by that one person.

Frustrations with Twitter have prompted some of us to ask that we move to Facebook.  I’m afraid I was rather vocal in stating that I don’t do Facebook, period.  That is still the case for me, even if all of my fellow Refugees agree to go to Facebook.

Tony has been extremely helpful in opening his Gonzoecon blog (on the WordPress platform) to BOTW Refugees.  I have applied for a subscription to the e-mails, but have not yet received confirmation.  Until I get access, I can’t begin to describe the experience.

Tony has also provided us with a discussion forum on ProBoards, and I do have access to that forum now, but there has not been enough activity yet for me to describe the experience.

My humble opinion is that what we need is a blog that is as close a match as possible to the old BOTW we used to know, where “authors” can contribute posts for blog visitors to comment on and reply to each other’s comments, in an easy-to-navigate thread.  Last night, after many hours of research, I found a template and a format that seemed to fill the bill.  Unfortunately, I was not aware of how much animosity there is for Google amongst BOTW Refugees.  Had I known, I would not have ventured into Blogger.

Pretty much everything I have to say about this blog’s structure and functionality is in the first post and in my replies to comments of those who have kindly come to take a look and give it a whirl.  It’s pretty easy to use the blog, easiest of all if you’re logged in to your Google account before you come to the blog.

I do appreciate that Google is a no-go for many of the BOTW Refugees.  But quite frankly, I find the animosity misplaced.  Even my own animosity against Facebook is foolish, I admit it.  Because you see, all — all — social media is a data-minining operation.  No matter how you access the interwebs, your data is getting sucked up, baby, and sold to big corporations and the government for demographics, targeted advertising, and Lord knows what.  Long ago I chose Gmail as my e-mail service (I have about 10 different accounts for different purposes) and Google Chrome as my browser, because these products offer the best security and are robust and user-friendly.  It was refreshingly easy to set up the BOTW Refugees blog on Blogger (Blogspot).  And it didn’t cost me a dime.

What is Google going to get from me in this blog account?  Not much!  The account owner is BOTW Refugees, as in first name BOTW last name Refugees.  Google’s algorithms correctly assessed that I’m a human being, not a robot, and there were no personal questions asked.  I lied about my date of birth, and Google didn’t care.  I didn’t have to hand over my phone number,  street address, or my first-born child to open the account.

We can say whatever we damn well please on the blog.  It is OUR blog.  However, I would hope that we keep our language civil.

I have deleted a couple of my own comments already, either as tests of the system or because I made a mistake, not because I said a wirty dord and regretted it.  As administrator, I have found that the process of expunging comments is easy-peasy.  I’m sure Miz Storey gets a thrill up her leg every time she deletes a deplorables comment at the newspaper where she now ‘elevates discourse’.  I would only delete a comment if it were from a robot or a spammer or a troll.

Even though I created the blog and am the administrator, I have no vested ownership, and would gladly transfer the account to anyone else in our group who wants to be the administrator.  For security reasons, I doubt Google would allow multiple administrators.

Instead of multiple administrators, there should be multiple authors, people who write the content for the posts (the Admiral’s role of old), at whatever frequency we find agreeable.  So far the blog has two authors: Melly and me.  If this blog flies, I will gladly extend invitations to others — I would need your e-mail addresses, or you can e-mail a request to botwrefugees at gmail dot com (I have purposely broken the address into segments to protect it from bots that sweep the interwebs to glom up e-mail addresses to spam and phish).

I was up till dawn creating the blog.  Even though it was easy to create, it took hours to settle on Blogger (Blogspot) as the platform.  There are a lot of blog platforms available, but the top two are Blogger (Blogspot) and WordPress, and the latter costs money — and from what I’ve read, you need to be a WordPress subscriber to avoid having to go through the captcha process every time you try to log on to comment.

If you’re not logged in to a Gmail account, you have two alternatives to comment, but I’ve only tested one of them:  Anonymous.  Click on Anonymous in the drop-down list below the comment box.  Be sure to say something in your comment to identify yourself, otherwise no one will know who Anonymous is.

I haven’t had a nap today to catch up on lost sleep, so I’m feeling a bit crispy, but this is kind of how I live day to day anyway, especially at the full moon, Lord knows why.

This is Easter, the day of Resurrection.  It is also Passover, the liberation of the Israelites from Egyptian slavery.  We need to find a place of resurrection and liberation, a place where our ark can land and we can speak freely, without censors.

Because of my own fierce aversion to Facebook, I do respect the aversion to Google amongst many in our group, and so I will probably shut down the BOTW Refugees blog if there is no interest in it.  But until we find a better, more aggreable landing-place, I offer it as a temporary islet in the vast sea of uncertainty.

This is the blog’s second post, and I hope you will comment.  I would love to hear your opinions and suggestions.  There will also be a third post soon, which I hope will invite the kind of conversation BOTW Refugees can enjoy — and of course everyone is free to go off-topic, too!

I will also check in once a day at Twitter to see how things are going in discussions about where we go from here.  I hope with all my heart that someone will find a place we can all agree on.  I just wonder if there actually is a single place that all of us will like.

We shall find a way.  Or not.  But life will go on.

Hugs to all,
Jude

Saturday, April 20, 2019

It's a start

Whether this blog flies or not will depend on whether it provides the kind of forum desired by BOTW Refugees. This is the first post and is primarily a test, like a tyke on a trike. Please feel free to suggest changes. This is OUR blog, and we can make it how we like, hopefully.

The blog administrator at present is Jude, but I can transfer the Google account to anyone else who wants to take the helm of this ark.  I am in the process of inviting other Refugees to contribute posts, but this is going to take a little time.

For now the blog is open to anyone (not just Refugees) to read and to comment.  It is possible the comments will get peppered with spam.  I will delete it whenever it appears.  A more secure alternative would be to open the blog to only those who have a Google account (Google verifies all accounts are humans, not robots).  Unfortunately, anyone with a strong aversion to Google would not be able to participate, so that's a big negative.  The least desirable alternative would be to restrict the blog to members only.  This would make the blog hard to find, invisible to newbies looking for it, and difficult for me to manage.

WordPress costs money, and to the best of my knowledge you have to be a WordPress subscriber to comment.

FEEL FREE TO COMMENT, by clicking on the little Comments link below.  I welcome your feedback.